- 28-06-2017 / 01-07-2019 : European Conservatives and Reformists Group - Member
John FLACK : 8th parliamentary term
Political groups
National parties
- 28-06-2017 / 01-07-2019 : Conservative Party (United Kingdom)
Member
- 04-07-2017 / 13-09-2017 : Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection
- 04-07-2017 / 01-07-2019 : Committee on Regional Development
- 04-07-2017 / 01-07-2019 : Delegation for relations with the People's Republic of China
Substitute
- 04-07-2017 / 05-07-2017 : Committee on Petitions
- 04-07-2017 / 01-07-2019 : Delegation for relations with Japan
- 05-07-2017 / 01-07-2019 : Committee on Fisheries
Main parliamentary activities
Reports - as shadow rapporteur
Political groups designate a shadow rapporteur for each report in the responsible committee to follow progress and negotiate compromise texts with the rapporteur. Rule 215
Opinions - as rapporteur
Committees may draft an opinion to a report of the responsible committee covering the elements linked to their committee remit. Rapporteurs of such opinions are also responsible for the drafting of compromise amendments and negotiations with shadow rapporteurs of the opinion. Rule 56, Rule 57, Annex VI
Oral questions
Questions for oral answer with debate, addressed to the European Commission, the Council or the Vice-President of the Commission/High Representative of the Union can be tabled by a committee, a political group or at least 5% of Parliament’s members. Rule 136
Other parliamentary activities
Written explanations of vote
Members can submit a written explanation of their vote in plenary. Rule 194
John Flack MEP, on behalf of the UK Conservative delegation of the ECR Group.
The UK Conservative delegation of the ECR voted in favour of this report as it provides a valuable insight into the challenges and obstacles faced by internal EU border regions. Moreover, it highlights good practices and success stories as well as the importance of access to public services, and small-scale projects in bringing people together and generating new potential for local development.
Nonetheless, we would like to underline that we do oppose any recommendation of a ‘significantly increased budget’ for European Territorial Cooperation projects. The benefits of these projects require further assessment before such a recommendation could be justified. Furthermore, any suggestion that Member States should consider aligning their legal systems and any forced multilingual approach to administration would unnecessarily trample on the sovereignty of Member States to decide on these issues as they see fit.