Aviation strategy — European Union Aviation Safety Agency: Initial Appraisal of a European Commission Impact Assessment
The main strengths of the IA are its apparently solid information base, including the two supporting studies, as well as good presentation of stakeholder views and the results of the public consultation throughout. It is, however, unfortunate that the external supporting studies do not appear to be publicly available. The IA would have benefitted from a clearer and more complete presentation of the background information and problem definition, as well as more direct reference to the evidence identified. There appears to be a certain bias towards the preferred options, as far as the way in which options are presented is concerned; the question remains as to whether additional options could have been considered in order to provide a broader choice of genuine alternatives. There are also some technical presentation issues, such as rather inconsistent numbering of the items in some sections. It is striking that no reference whatsoever appears to be made to the existence of a second, separate IA (on drones) which accompanies the same proposal and thus is presumably intended to complete the overall analysis.
Briefing
Par šo dokumentu
Publikācijas veids
Autors
Politikas joma
Atslēgvārds
- administratīvās formalitātes
- civilā aviācija
- Eiropas Aviācijas drošības aģentūra
- EIROPAS SAVIENĪBA
- Eiropas Savienības iestādes un Eiropas civildienests
- Eiropas Savienības tiesību akti
- Eiropas struktūra
- EKONOMIKA
- ekonomikas analīze
- ES tiesību aktu izstrāde
- gaisa satiksmes drošība
- gaisa un kosmiskais transports
- ietekmes izpēte
- izpildvara un valsts dienests
- konkurētspēja
- POLITIKA
- TIESĪBAS
- tiesību aktu vienkāršošana
- tiesību avoti un nozares
- transporta politika
- TRANSPORTS
- UZŅĒMĒJDARBĪBA UN KONKURENCE
- uzņēmējdarbības organizācija
- vienotais tirgus