Mutual recognition of goods lawfully marketed in another Member State
An initial appraisal of the impact assessment accompanying the Commission proposal clearly defines the problem, as well as the general and specific objectives. Operational objectives appear to be relevant and achievable, even though they appear not to be entirely set according to the recommendations included in the better regulation toolbox. The IA presents a reasonable range of options and choses a combination of soft law measures and legislative changes (options 2 and 4). Among the measures proposed, the introduction of a declaration of compliance could have benefited from further substantiation of its added value. While an SME test was conducted, the analysis regarding the impact on competitiveness is largely missing. The Commission has consulted a broad range of stakeholders, whose views have been extensively analysed and illustrated. The research, analysis, and supporting evidence included or referenced in the IA provide ample and detailed insights on the different issues considered, making the overall analysis, and the assessments of the retained options, reasonably sound.
Briefing
Ārējais autors
-
Par šo dokumentu
Publikācijas veids
Autors
Politikas joma
Atslēgvārds
- administratīvā sadarbība
- brīva preču kustība
- EIROPAS SAVIENĪBA
- Eiropas Savienības tiesību akti
- Eiropas struktūra
- ekonomiskā ģeogrāfija
- ES dalībvalsts
- informācija un informācijas apstrāde
- informācijas apmaiņa
- IZGLĪTĪBA UN KOMUNIKĀCIJAS
- izpildvara un valsts dienests
- patēriņš
- POLITIKA
- preces un pakalpojumi
- RAŽOŠANA, TEHNOLOĢIJA UN PĒTNIECĪBA
- savstarpējas atzīšanas princips
- starptautiskā tirdzniecība
- tehniskā instrukcija
- tehnoloģija un tehniskā reglamentācija
- TIRDZNIECĪBA
- tirgus atļauja
- tirgzinības
- vienotais tirgus
- ĢEOGRĀFIJA