8

Ergebnis(se)

Wort/Wörter
Art der Veröffentlichung
Politikbereich
Verfasser
Schlagwortliste
Datum

Establishing a cybersecurity competence centre and a network of national coordination centres

19-02-2019

The Commission describes logically the significance of cyberdefence and the potential for improvement in this field for the EU. However, the impact assessment accompanying the proposal does not appear to have fully followed the requirements of the better regulation guidelines particularly as no open public consultation was conducted. The impact assessment presents a limited range of options as a result of a number of parameters that were pre-set from the outset and which could have constrained the ...

The Commission describes logically the significance of cyberdefence and the potential for improvement in this field for the EU. However, the impact assessment accompanying the proposal does not appear to have fully followed the requirements of the better regulation guidelines particularly as no open public consultation was conducted. The impact assessment presents a limited range of options as a result of a number of parameters that were pre-set from the outset and which could have constrained the scope of the impact assessment.

Erasmus 2021-2027

15-11-2018

The focus of the new Erasmus programme 2021-2027 is on inclusiveness and on better reach of young people with fewer opportunities. The priorities and action steps of the new programme are described in the impact assessment in detail, however, no description is given on the actual operation of these actions in practice.

The focus of the new Erasmus programme 2021-2027 is on inclusiveness and on better reach of young people with fewer opportunities. The priorities and action steps of the new programme are described in the impact assessment in detail, however, no description is given on the actual operation of these actions in practice.

Erasmus 2021-2027: The Union programme for education, training, youth and sport

06-11-2018

The Erasmus 2021-2027 proposal was published on 30 May 2018. Establishing a new programme would ensure the continuation of the Erasmus+ funding programme for education, training, youth and sport. The Commission claims its proposal would double the funds available to €30 000 million in current prices, from €14 712 million dedicated to Erasmus+. The proposal would also triple the number of participants. While Erasmus+ offered mobility opportunities to more than 4 million people, the new programming ...

The Erasmus 2021-2027 proposal was published on 30 May 2018. Establishing a new programme would ensure the continuation of the Erasmus+ funding programme for education, training, youth and sport. The Commission claims its proposal would double the funds available to €30 000 million in current prices, from €14 712 million dedicated to Erasmus+. The proposal would also triple the number of participants. While Erasmus+ offered mobility opportunities to more than 4 million people, the new programming period aims to reach up to 12 million participants. The new proposal also aims at greater simplification for end-users, incorporates sports in the main structure of the programme, expands the use of digitalisation, supports new areas of knowledge and introduces Discover EU, a new mobility initiative. Stakeholders agreed that the current programme is highly beneficial but lessons need to be learnt to help the next generation programme run more efficiently and effectively.

Discharge for 2015 budget – European Commission and executive agencies

21-04-2017

During the April II plenary session, the European Parliament is expected to decide whether to grant discharge for the 2015 financial year to the different institutions and bodies of the European Union (EU). The debate will start with the report covering the European Commission (plus six executive agencies) which manages the biggest share of the EU general budget. Separate discharge is granted to the Commission concerning the management of the European Development Funds (EDFs), because the EDFs are ...

During the April II plenary session, the European Parliament is expected to decide whether to grant discharge for the 2015 financial year to the different institutions and bodies of the European Union (EU). The debate will start with the report covering the European Commission (plus six executive agencies) which manages the biggest share of the EU general budget. Separate discharge is granted to the Commission concerning the management of the European Development Funds (EDFs), because the EDFs are not part of the general budget of the EU but based on intergovernmental agreement. The Committee on Budgetary Control (CONT) recommends the plenary should grant the Commission and all six executive agencies discharge for 2015, and also to grant discharge in respect of the implementation of the operations of the 8th, 9th, 10th and 11th EDFs in that year.

Discharge for 2014 budget – European Commission and executive agencies

25-04-2016

On 28 April 2016, the European Parliament (EP) will decide whether to grant discharge for the 2014 financial year to the different institutions and bodies of the European Union (EU). The debate will open with the report covering the European Commission (plus six executive agencies) which manages the biggest share of the EU general budget. Separate discharge is granted to the Commission concerning the management of the European Development Funds (EDFs), because this fund is not part of the general ...

On 28 April 2016, the European Parliament (EP) will decide whether to grant discharge for the 2014 financial year to the different institutions and bodies of the European Union (EU). The debate will open with the report covering the European Commission (plus six executive agencies) which manages the biggest share of the EU general budget. Separate discharge is granted to the Commission concerning the management of the European Development Funds (EDFs), because this fund is not part of the general budget of the EU but based on intergovernmental agreement. The Committee on Budgetary Control (CONT) recommends to plenary to grant the Commission and all six executive agencies discharge for 2014, and also to grant discharge in respect of the implementation of the operations of the 8th, 9th, 10th and 11th EDFs in that year.

Haushalt und Durchführung von Horizont 2020: Ein Leitfaden zur Struktur des Programms

03-11-2015

Horizont 2020, das aktuelle Rahmenprogramm für Forschung und Innovation, übernahm Merkmale seiner Vorgänger, während gleichzeitig eine neue Architektur für die Förderung sämtlicher Tätigkeiten im Forschungs- und Innovationssystem – angefangen von der Grundlagenforschung bis hin zu marktnahen Anwendungen – vorgeschlagen wurde. Durch die Einbindung sämtlicher dieser Dimensionen ergaben sich für die Durchführung des Programms verschiedene Komplexitätsstufen. Dieses Dokument gibt einen Überblick über ...

Horizont 2020, das aktuelle Rahmenprogramm für Forschung und Innovation, übernahm Merkmale seiner Vorgänger, während gleichzeitig eine neue Architektur für die Förderung sämtlicher Tätigkeiten im Forschungs- und Innovationssystem – angefangen von der Grundlagenforschung bis hin zu marktnahen Anwendungen – vorgeschlagen wurde. Durch die Einbindung sämtlicher dieser Dimensionen ergaben sich für die Durchführung des Programms verschiedene Komplexitätsstufen. Dieses Dokument gibt einen Überblick über das Programm. Darin werden die verschiedenen Stufen der Komplexität nach der Verteilung des Budgets – beginnend bei den neun Generaldirektionen der Kommission, deren Aufsicht Horizont 2020 untersteht, bis zu den 22 Einrichtungen, die dessen Durchführung verwalten, anhand der drei wichtigsten Säulen und beiden Einzelziele – ergründet.

How the EU budget is spent: Europe for Citizens (2014-2020)

02-07-2015

The European Union (EU) programme, Europe for Citizens (EFC), aims at encouraging direct participation of citizens at EU level and promoting dialogue between the EU institutions, civil society organisations and municipalities. The programme has been running since 2004. For the 2014-20 period the EFC focuses on enhancing European citizens' awareness of remembrance and the history of the EU, and on actively involving European civil society in shaping EU policy.

The European Union (EU) programme, Europe for Citizens (EFC), aims at encouraging direct participation of citizens at EU level and promoting dialogue between the EU institutions, civil society organisations and municipalities. The programme has been running since 2004. For the 2014-20 period the EFC focuses on enhancing European citizens' awareness of remembrance and the history of the EU, and on actively involving European civil society in shaping EU policy.

TEN-V Großprojekte - Investitionen und Kosten

15-01-2013

Berichte über erhebliche Versäumnisse bei Planung und Beschaffung in Verbindung mit Großvorhaben sind weit verbreitet. Ziel dieser Studie ist es, zu ermitteln, ob und wie von TEN-V kofinanzierte Projekte von solchen operativen Problemen betroffen sind. Zudem wird beabsichtigt, Empfehlungen zur Vermeidung solcher Probleme für den nächsten TEN-V Programmplanungszeitraum bereitzustellen. Ausgehend von einer Literaturanalyse sowie von zehn Fallstudien werden in der vorliegenden Studie Empfehlungen für ...

Berichte über erhebliche Versäumnisse bei Planung und Beschaffung in Verbindung mit Großvorhaben sind weit verbreitet. Ziel dieser Studie ist es, zu ermitteln, ob und wie von TEN-V kofinanzierte Projekte von solchen operativen Problemen betroffen sind. Zudem wird beabsichtigt, Empfehlungen zur Vermeidung solcher Probleme für den nächsten TEN-V Programmplanungszeitraum bereitzustellen. Ausgehend von einer Literaturanalyse sowie von zehn Fallstudien werden in der vorliegenden Studie Empfehlungen für die Verbesserung der strategischen Planung, für die Auswahl und Definition von Projekten sowie für eine fundierte Einschätzung verkehrstechnischer und sozioökonomischer Auswirkungen ausgearbeitet. Die Rolle transparenter Informationen im Hinblick auf die Ex-ante-Planung und den Ex-post-Erfolg wird untersucht, um Entscheidungen über Kofinanzierungen und die Überwachung der Projektrealisierung durch die EU zu unterstützen.

Externe Autor

Wolfgang Schade and Florian Senger (Fraunhofer-Institut für System- und Innovationsforschung, Germany) ; Werner Rothengatter (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany) ; Olaf Meyer-Rühle and Ian Sean Brouwer (ProgTrans, Switzerland)

Partner