National Security and Secret Evidence in Legislation and before the Courts: Exploring the Challenges
At the request of the LIBE committee, this study provides a comparative analysis of the national legal regimes and practices governing the use of intelligence information as evidence in the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Spain, Italy, the Netherlands and Sweden. It explores notably how national security can be invoked to determine the classification of information and evidence as 'state secrets' in court proceedings and whether such laws and practices are fundamental rights- and rule of law-compliant. The study finds that, in the majority of Member States under investigation, the judiciary is significantly hindered in effectively adjudicating justice and guaranteeing the rights of the defence in ‘national security’ cases. The research also illustrates that the very term ‘national security’ is nebulously defined across the Member States analysed, with no national definition meeting legal certainty and “in accordance with the law” standards and a clear risk that the executive and secret services may act arbitrarily. The study argues that national and transnational intelligence community practices and cooperation need to be subject to more independent and effective judicial accountability and be brought into line with EU 'rule of law' standards.
Étude
Auteur externe
Didier Bigo (Centre d’Etudes sur les Conflits, Liberté et Sécurité - CCLS ; Sciences-Po Paris ; King’s College London), Sergio Carrera (Centre for European Policy Studies, CEPS), Nicholas Hernanz (CEPS) and Amandine Scherrer (CCLS) ; Contributions in the Country Fiches by: Mar Jimeno Bulnes (University of Burgos, Spain), Emmy Eklundh (University of Manchester, United Kingdom), Roseline Letteron (Université Paris-Sorbonne, France), Nikolaus Marsch (University of Freiburg in Breisgau, Germany), Daniel Squires (Matrix Chambers, London, United Kingdom), Arianna Vedaschi (Bocconi University, Milan, Italy), Gabriele Marino (University of Exeter, United Kingdom) and Anja Wiesbrock (University of Oslo, Norway)
À propos de ce document
Type de publication
Domaine politique
Mot-clé
- Allemagne
- atteinte à la sûreté de l'État
- cadre politique
- convention européenne des droits de l’homme
- DROIT
- droit de l'Union européenne
- droit pénal
- droits de la défense
- droits et libertés
- défense
- Espagne
- Europe
- France
- GÉOGRAPHIE
- géographie politique
- géographie économique
- information et traitement de l'information
- Italie
- justice
- liberté de la presse
- Pays-Bas
- politique internationale
- principe de sécurité juridique
- protection des témoins
- RELATIONS INTERNATIONALES
- Royaume-Uni
- secret d'État
- service secret
- Suède
- sécurité publique
- témoignage
- UNION EUROPÉENNE
- VIE POLITIQUE
- vie politique et sécurité publique
- ÉDUCATION ET COMMUNICATION
- État de droit