49

résultat(s)

Mot(s)
Type de publication
Domaine politique
Auteur
Date

Economic Dialogue with the Other EU Institutions under the European Semester Cycles, January 2019

03-10-2019

This document provides an overview of Economic Dialogues with the other institutions of the European Union that has taken place in the competent Committee of the European Parliament from January 2014 until January 2019 under the European Semester Cycles. It also includes an overview of the respective legal bases for these dialogues.

This document provides an overview of Economic Dialogues with the other institutions of the European Union that has taken place in the competent Committee of the European Parliament from January 2014 until January 2019 under the European Semester Cycles. It also includes an overview of the respective legal bases for these dialogues.

The Council of the EU: from the Congress of Ambassadors to a genuine Parliamentary Chamber?

14-01-2019

This study commissioned by the European Parliament’s Policy Department for Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs at the request of the AFCO Committee discusses the parliamentary nature of the Council. It analyses how the Council is in between a pure parliamentary institution and a non-parliamentary one from a wide range of perspectives, for example its structure, procedure and transparency. The study recommends incremental reforms towards further parliamentarisation rather than radical ones ...

This study commissioned by the European Parliament’s Policy Department for Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs at the request of the AFCO Committee discusses the parliamentary nature of the Council. It analyses how the Council is in between a pure parliamentary institution and a non-parliamentary one from a wide range of perspectives, for example its structure, procedure and transparency. The study recommends incremental reforms towards further parliamentarisation rather than radical ones.

Review Clauses in EU Legislation: A Rolling Check-List (6th edition)

29-06-2018

This study provides an overview of review clauses (reviews, evaluations, implementation reports) contained in EU legislation during the sixth, seventh and the current, eighth parliamentary term. Drawing on information publicly available across several sources, it provides in a single, comprehensive repository an analytical overview of acts that contain a review clause. The study puts a special focus on (and the analysis of) review clauses in EU legislative acts adopted during the current parliamentary ...

This study provides an overview of review clauses (reviews, evaluations, implementation reports) contained in EU legislation during the sixth, seventh and the current, eighth parliamentary term. Drawing on information publicly available across several sources, it provides in a single, comprehensive repository an analytical overview of acts that contain a review clause. The study puts a special focus on (and the analysis of) review clauses in EU legislative acts adopted during the current parliamentary term (with a total of 147 legislative acts with a review clause adopted through the ordinary legislative procedure up until end of December 2017).

Le Conseil européen et le cadre financier pluriannuel

21-02-2018

Avec l’entrée en vigueur du traité de Lisbonne, le CFP s’est vu doté d’une base juridique dans les traités de l’Union pour la première fois et une nouvelle procédure a été introduite pour son adoption. Le CFP est désormais établi dans un règlement adopté par le Conseil, lequel agit selon une procédure législative spéciale, une fois l’approbation du Parlement européen obtenue. Le processus du CFP pour l’après 2020 constituera la seconde application intégrale de cette nouvelle procédure, s’inscrivant ...

Avec l’entrée en vigueur du traité de Lisbonne, le CFP s’est vu doté d’une base juridique dans les traités de l’Union pour la première fois et une nouvelle procédure a été introduite pour son adoption. Le CFP est désormais établi dans un règlement adopté par le Conseil, lequel agit selon une procédure législative spéciale, une fois l’approbation du Parlement européen obtenue. Le processus du CFP pour l’après 2020 constituera la seconde application intégrale de cette nouvelle procédure, s’inscrivant dans le sillage des négociations sur le CFP 2014-2020 . Le traité de Lisbonne a également érigé le Conseil européen au rang d’institution de l’Union européenne, au côté de six autres entités, et a défini son rôle et ses compétences. Conformément à l’article 15, paragraphe 1, du traité sur l’Union européenne (traité UE), « [l]e Conseil européen donne à l’Union les impulsions nécessaires à son développement et en définit les orientations et les priorités politiques générales ». Par ailleurs, le Conseil européen « n’exerce pas de fonction législative ». Nonobstant cette interdiction relative à l’exercice de fonctions législatives et malgré l’absence de l’octroi d’un rôle formel par les dispositions financières des traités [articles 310 à 324 du traité sur le fonctionnement de l’Union européenne (traité FUE)], le Conseil européen (comme c’était déjà le cas avant l’entrée en vigueur du traité de Lisbonne) a joué un rôle central dans les négociations sur le CFP 2014-2020. Agissant en vertu de ses compétences pour « défini[r] les orientations et les priorités politiques générales », le Conseil européen a adopté des conclusions précises sur le CFP, qui se voulaient une définition des enveloppes financières et des plafonds du CFP pour tous les secteurs politiques sur la période de sept ans du CFP. Dans sa résolution du 15 avril 2014 intitulée « Négociations sur le CFP 2014-2020: enseignements à tirer et voie à suivre », le Parlement européen a répertorié l’incidence de l’implication du Conseil européen dans les prérogatives législatives du Parlement parmi les sujets particulièrement problématiques.

2018 Recommendations on the economic policy of the Euro Area: A comparison of Commission and Council texts (the ‘comply or explain’ principle)

08-02-2018

This document compares the draft 2018 Recommendations for the economic policy of the Euro Area proposed by the European Commission on 22 November 2017 with the 2018 Euro Area draft recommendation revised by the Economic and Financial Committee on 17 January 2018 and to be approved by the Council (ECOFIN) on 23 January 2018.

This document compares the draft 2018 Recommendations for the economic policy of the Euro Area proposed by the European Commission on 22 November 2017 with the 2018 Euro Area draft recommendation revised by the Economic and Financial Committee on 17 January 2018 and to be approved by the Council (ECOFIN) on 23 January 2018.

Décharge sur le budget 2015 – Conseil et Conseil européen

23-10-2017

Au cours de la plénière d’octobre II, le Parlement doit clore la procédure de décharge relative aux comptes du Conseil pour l’exercice 2015 en se prononçant sur le second rapport de la commission du contrôle budgétaire. Depuis plusieurs années maintenant, le Parlement refuse de donner décharge au Conseil et au Conseil européen.

Au cours de la plénière d’octobre II, le Parlement doit clore la procédure de décharge relative aux comptes du Conseil pour l’exercice 2015 en se prononçant sur le second rapport de la commission du contrôle budgétaire. Depuis plusieurs années maintenant, le Parlement refuse de donner décharge au Conseil et au Conseil européen.

Democratic accountability of Council's budget - Council executive powers

21-06-2017

This in-depth analysis introduces the challenges that have been faced in delivering a discharge of the Council’s budget over the last decade, with particular regard to the Council’s executive activities. It analyses the institutional and legal constraints, and it makes a number of recommendations for how to achieve more accountability regarding the Council’s budget and executive expenditure without resorting to treaty reform.

This in-depth analysis introduces the challenges that have been faced in delivering a discharge of the Council’s budget over the last decade, with particular regard to the Council’s executive activities. It analyses the institutional and legal constraints, and it makes a number of recommendations for how to achieve more accountability regarding the Council’s budget and executive expenditure without resorting to treaty reform.

Auteur externe

CEPS: Dr Giacomo Benedetto (Jean Monnet Chair, Royal Holloway, University of London) ; Dr David Rinaldi (Research Fellow, CEPS & Maîtres de conférences, ULB 0Institute for European Studies) ; Dr Hartmut Aden (Professor, Berlin School of Economics and Law)

2017 Country Specific Recommendations: A comparison of the Commission and Council recommendations (the ‘comply or explain’ principle)

15-06-2017

The document compares the draft 2017 Country Specific Recommendations (CSRs) proposed by the Commission on 22 May 2017 with the 2017 CSRs agreed on the Council Committee level (documents dated 12 June 2017) and submitted to the Council (ECOFIN) for approval on 16 June 2017. These CSRs are to be generally endorsed by the European Council on 22 23 June 2017 and formally adopted by the Council (ECOFIN) on 11 July 2017.

The document compares the draft 2017 Country Specific Recommendations (CSRs) proposed by the Commission on 22 May 2017 with the 2017 CSRs agreed on the Council Committee level (documents dated 12 June 2017) and submitted to the Council (ECOFIN) for approval on 16 June 2017. These CSRs are to be generally endorsed by the European Council on 22 23 June 2017 and formally adopted by the Council (ECOFIN) on 11 July 2017.

Council discharge by the European Parliament - Finding solutions

15-06-2017

This study synthesises the main arguments behind the disagreement between the Parliament and the Council over the issue of whether the discharge procedure allows the Parliament to hold the Council to account concerning the management of its own administrative budget. It then examines the discharge procedure as an accountability mechanism and its impact on the EU legitimacy. It concludes that significant improvement is needed, regardless of which exit to the conflict is chosen. Four scenarios to break ...

This study synthesises the main arguments behind the disagreement between the Parliament and the Council over the issue of whether the discharge procedure allows the Parliament to hold the Council to account concerning the management of its own administrative budget. It then examines the discharge procedure as an accountability mechanism and its impact on the EU legitimacy. It concludes that significant improvement is needed, regardless of which exit to the conflict is chosen. Four scenarios to break the deadlock are put forward, assessing their respective advantages and shortcomings.

Auteur externe

Dr Maria-Luisa Sanchez-Barrueco (Senior Lecturer in EU Law, University of Deusto) ; Dr Paul Stephenson (Assistant Professor, Maastricht University)

Documentation from the Workshop on Council Discharge - Finding Solutions

15-05-2017

Different perceptions of the institutional role of the Council and of the Parliament in the discharge exercise, and the Council's lack of cooperation with Parliament by refusing to reply to the questionnaire sent annually in the frame of the discharge, led the Parliament to refuse granting discharge to the Secretary General of the Council in relation to the financial years 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2014. Given the importance of cooperation between the two institutions and responsibility before ...

Different perceptions of the institutional role of the Council and of the Parliament in the discharge exercise, and the Council's lack of cooperation with Parliament by refusing to reply to the questionnaire sent annually in the frame of the discharge, led the Parliament to refuse granting discharge to the Secretary General of the Council in relation to the financial years 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2014. Given the importance of cooperation between the two institutions and responsibility before the EU citizens, the Parliament stresses an urgent need for better dialogue. The Parliament as a discharge authority is looking for ways to solve the institutional conflict and to move forward in the process of granting discharge to the Council. The workshop should discuss ways to solve the institutional conflict by strengthening the Parliament's role as the discharge authority.

Auteur externe

Dr. Giacomo BENEDETTO, Jean Monnet Chair in EU Budget Policy, Royal Holloway, University of London Dr. David RINALDI, Research Fellow at CEPS Dr. Hartmut ADEN, Professor of European and German Public Law, Berlin School of Economics and Law Dr. Maria-Luisa SANCHEZ-BARRUECO, Senior Lecturer of European Union Law, University of Deusto Dr. Paul STEPHENSON, Assistant Professor, University of Maastricht

Evénements à venir

28-01-2020
Western Balkans: A rocky road to enlargement
Autre événement -
EPRS
29-01-2020
Where all students can succeed: Analysing the latest OECD PISA results
Autre événement -
EPRS
29-01-2020
The Future of Artificial Intelligence for Europe
Atelier -
STOA

Partenaires

Restez connectés

email update imageSystème d'alertes email

Le système d'alertes email, qui envoie directement les dernières informations à votre adresse électronique, vous permet de suivre toutes les personnes et tous les événements liés au Parlement. Ceci inclut les dernières nouvelles des députés, les services d'information ou le Think Tank.

Le système est accessible partout sur le site du Parlement. Pour vous abonner et recevoir les notifications du Think Tank, il suffit de communiquer votre adresse email, de sélectionner le thème qui vous intéresse, d'indiquer la fréquence (quotidienne, hebdomadaire ou mensuelle) et de confirmer votre enregistrement en cliquant sur le lien envoyé par email.

RSS imageFlux RSS

Ne manquez aucune information ou mise à jour du site du Parlement européen grâce à notre flux RSS.

Veuillez cliquer sur le lien ci-dessous afin de configurer votre flux.