Use of energy from renewable sources
Despite its considerable length and a rather large number of options (over 30), the IA report could have delivered a more coherent, comprehensive, and persuasive analysis. The internal logic of the report and the arrangement of options is at times hard to understand because the options are linked to challenges rather than to clearly defined problems and objectives. Furthermore, the absence of preferred options makes it difficult to assess the usefulness of the impact assessment in informing the political decisions underpinning the legislative proposal. The use of different models, which are by the Commission's own admittance very difficult to compare, may have led to a certain lack of coherence in the assessment of the impacts. The proportionality of proposed measures is not always clearly visible compared with the evidence provided by the models used in the assessment. Overall, given the number of considerable shortcomings and the fact that the assessment twice received a negative opinion from the RSB, one might have expected a better argumentation for the Commission's decision to proceed with the proposal.
Briefing
Maidir leis an doiciméad seo
Saghas foilseacháin
Údar
Réimse beartas
Eochairfhocal
- acmhainní in-athnuaite
- AN tAONTAS EORPACH
- anailís eacnamaíoch
- beartas comhair
- beartas comhshaoil
- beartas fuinnimh
- bithbhreosla
- bithmhais
- CAIDREAMH IDIRNÁISIÚNTA
- clár an Aontais Eorpaigh
- coigilt fuinnimh
- comhaontú idirnáisiúnta
- comhar comhshaoil
- COMHSHAOL
- EACNAMAÍOCHT
- FUINNEAMH
- fuinneamh bog
- fuinneamh in-athnuaite
- gnóthaí eachtracha
- gás ceaptha teasa
- laghdú astaíochtaí gás
- sprioc táirgeachta
- staidéar tionchair
- teicneolaíocht agus rialacháin theicniúla
- timpeallacht nádúrtha
- tomhailt fuinnimh
- trochlú an chomhshaoil
- truailliú an atmaisféir
- táirgeadh
- TÁIRGEADH, TEICNEOLAÍOCHT AGUS TAIGHDE
- tógáil Eorpach