Best practices in legislative and regulatory processes in a constitutional perspective: the case of the European Union
This briefing note discusses the key features of the EU better lawmaking agenda, also in light of the new EU better regulation package, and highlights areas in which the EU can be considered a best practice, as well as existing gaps and concerns. Gaps include problems of accountability and transparency, uncertainty in methodology and lack the coherence between better regulation and long-term policy goals. Concerns relate to the newly adopted package and refer to the sustainability of the workload, the lack of a real attribution of responsibility for the update of EU impact assessments during the ordinary legislative procedure and uncertainty on the treatment of self- and co-regulation within the Inter-institutional Agreement on Better Regulation.
Detaljna analiza
Vanjski autor
Andrea Renda, Senior research Fellow, Centre for European Policy Studies
Informacije o dokumentu
Vrsta publikacije
Ključna riječ
- donošenje odluke
- EKONOMIJA
- ekonomska analiza
- Europska komisija
- EUROPSKA UNIJA
- institucije EU-a i europska javna služba
- izrada pravnih propisa
- izrada pravnih propisa EU-a
- izvori i grane prava
- menadžment
- međuinstitucionalni sporazum EU-a
- načelo proporcionalnosti
- načelo supsidijarnosti
- pojednostavljenje zakonodavstva
- POLITIKA
- POSLOVANJE I KONKURENCIJA
- PRAVO
- pravo EU-a
- provedba prava EU-a
- rad parlamenta
- studija o utjecaju
- transparentnost u donošenju odluka
- upravljanje institucijama