Proportionality test before adoption of new regulation of professions
In general, the IA appears to set out logical reasoning linking the problem, its underlying drivers, the objectives and the policy options to tackle the problem. It seems to be based on sound research and analysis, while nevertheless recognising that there are still data gaps to be filled. With regard to the analysis of impacts, a more targeted analysis of the likely impacts on SMEs might have been desirable. Also, the IA does not seem to identify operational objectives for its preferred policy option and corresponding monitoring indicators. More generally, a proof-reading of the final text, and different choices as to its organisation and presentation, would almost certainly have considerably improved the IA's clarity and readability and its effectiveness in supporting the policy choices made in the proposal.
Briefing
Dwar dan id-dokument
Tip ta’ pubblikazzjoni
Awtur
Qasam tematiku
Kelma għat-tiftix
- aċċess għal professjoni
- DRITT
- dritt ta' stabiliment
- dritt tal-Unjoni Ewropea
- għejun u fergħat tad-dritt
- impjiegi
- IMPJIEGI U KUNDIZZJONIJIET TAX-XOGĦOL
- kostruzzjoni Ewropea
- KUMMERĊ
- kummerċjalizzazzjoni
- kwalifiki professjonali
- libertà li jiġu pprovduti servizzi
- moviment liberu tal-ħaddiema
- organizzazzjoni tat-trasport
- prinċipju tal-proporzjonalità
- provdiment ta’ servizzi
- sewwieqa
- simplifikazzjoni tal-leġiżlazzjoni
- suq tax-xogħol
- suq uniku
- TRASPORT
- UNJONI EWROPEA
- ħolqien tal-impjiegi