Human Rights Provisions in Economic Partnership Agreements in Light of the Expiry of the Cotonou Agreement in 2020
The study considers the options for suspending obligations under the EU-ACP Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs) in connection with violations of human rights, democratic principles or the rule of law following the expiry of the Cotonou Agreement in 2020. It outlines the functioning of the human rights clause in the Cotonou Agreement, before considering the possibilities for suspending the EPAs under their own provisions, or for other reasons in international law, such as countermeasures. Next, it discusses how any post-2020 arrangements can best continue the existing mechanisms for human rights conditionality set out in the Cotonou Agreement. In connection with this, this study proposes certain suggestions for improving future versions of human rights clauses, and considers whether there are legal obstacles to the invocation of this clause under general international law, principally under WTO law. The study concludes with a set of comments and recommendations.
Studju
Awtur estern
Lorand BARTELS
Dwar dan id-dokument
Tip ta’ pubblikazzjoni
Kelma għat-tiftix
- affarijiet internazzjonali
- demokrazija
- DRITT
- drittijiet tal-bniedem
- drittijiet u libertajiet
- ftehim interim (UE)
- ftehim kummerċjali (UE)
- ftehim ta' kooperazzjoni (UE)
- Il-Ftehim ta' Cotonou
- irtirar minn ftehim
- istituzzjoni AKP-UE
- kooperazzjoni ekonomika
- kostruzzjoni Ewropea
- Kunsill tas-Sigurtà tan-Nazzjonijiet Uniti
- l-OrganizzazzjoniDinjija tal-Kummerċ
- miżura restrittiva tal-UE
- Nazzjonijiet Uniti
- organizzazzjonijiet dinjin
- ORGANIZZAZZJONIJIET INTERNAZZJONALI
- POLITIKA
- politika ta' kooperazzjoni
- qafas politiku
- relazzjoni AKP-UE
- RELAZZJONIJIET INTERNAZZJONALI
- sanzjonijiet internazzjonali
- stat tad-dritt
- UNJONI EWROPEA